Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00872
Original file (BC 2013 00872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
_RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:			DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00872
		COUNSEL:  NONE
                     		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents.  

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He received poor counseling and advice, and was on terminal 
leave near the beginning of the TEB program.  As a result, he 
was not briefed that he had to accomplish the TEB action prior 
to his retirement.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement; and, copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of 
Release or Discharge from Active Duty; separation orders; 
retirement program; civilian personnel actions; and a letter of 
accomplishment.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who 
retired in the grade of lieutenant colonel effective 1 September 
2009.

For those members eligible for retirement after 1 August 2009, 
and before 1 August 2010, one year additional service is 
required in order to utilize TEB benefits.  

The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s 
military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends approval.  DPSIT states the applicant was 
on terminal leave at the time of the TEB program standup and did 
not have the opportunity to process the TEB action while on 
active duty.  Therefore, he suffered an injustice which should 
be corrected to show he elected TEB effective 1 August 2009.  

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 15 March 2013 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After 
reviewing the evidence of record, we are persuaded that 
favorable consideration of the applicant’s request is warranted.  
We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) 
indicates the applicant was on terminal leave at the time of the 
TEB program standup and did not have the opportunity to process 
the TEB action while on active duty; thereby, creating an 
injustice which should be corrected.  We agree with the 
recommendation by the Air Force OPR and adopt is rationale as 
the basis for our conclusions.  Accordingly, we recommend the 
records be corrected as indicated below.

__________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 August 2009 
he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. 

__________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-00872 in Executive Session on 16 December 2013, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                   , Panel Chair
                   , Member
                   , Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00872:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Feb 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 1 Mar 13.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Mar 13.




                  
Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01329

    Original file (BC 2013 01329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01329 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02326

    Original file (BC 2013 02326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 15a Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program, be amended to reflect “YES.” ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not aware of the requirement to transfer education benefits while on active duty nor was she counseled on the TEB process prior to retirement. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04584

    Original file (BC 2013 04584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04584 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she transferred her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to her dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02596

    Original file (BC 2013 02596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. We note the OPR recommends correcting the applicant’s retirement date to be effective 1 August 2009; however, current law and policy requires...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03603

    Original file (BC 2013 03603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He understands that this is not an overnight process and asks for understanding and hopes that the Board finds in his favor. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 29 September 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 January 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00526

    Original file (BC 2013 00526.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends approval. In this respect, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has indicated that through no fault of the applicant it appears he may not have been afforded the opportunity to transfer his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00237

    Original file (BC 2014 00237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00237 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependent while he was on active duty. At the time of his retirement, he was not told about the requirement to apply for TEB while he was still on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04835

    Original file (BC 2013 04835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance: Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03204

    Original file (BC 2013 03204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on information from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), the applicant was considered and non-selected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel (0-5) six times. On 31 Jul 09, the applicant was relieved from active duty and retired, effective 1 Aug 09, in the grade of major (0-4) with a narrative reason for separation of “Voluntary Retirement: Maximum Service or Time In Grade.” She was credited with 20 years and 8 days of total active service. Therefore, regardless of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04071

    Original file (BC 2013 04071.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He has served 4 years since the start of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit...